Thou Shalt Not Drink Bottled Water


As I was perusing the January 9, 2007 edition of The Christian Century, an article entitled, “Is Bottled Water a Moral Issue” from the news section grabbed my attention. Apparently a campaign is afoot in some Christian circles to declare that the consumption of bottled water is a justice issue, and, according to Mary Ann Coyle of the National Coalition of American Nuns, “a sin”. I almost spit out my Dasani for fear of offending the Almighty, but decided against it.

This campaign is “rooted in the notion that clean drinking water, like air, is a God given resource that shouldn’t be packaged and sold.” I have to admit that I was a little astounded by this assertion. After all, clean drinking water – bottled or otherwise – is not free. In fact, whether we drink water from a tap or from a bottle, we pay for it in one way or another. Like many of you, I receive a monthly bill from the local municipality that I must pay if I want water to continue to flow into my home. The only time in my life when this was not the case was when my family bought a house in Florida that had a well. Even then, we had to pay for the pump and all of its maintenance, which was just as much as the local city government charged at that time.

I spent a little bit of time looking at the website of an organization calling itself Presbyterians for Restoring Creation. It has some interesting information, and I think they are well-intentioned. They rightfully point out that one of the problems with bottled water is the excessive use of plastic bottles, most of which aren’t recycled. True, we should recycle those containers, as we really could do better recycling lots of containers. I am guilty of this, though the family and I are trying to take steps to recycle more, in spite of the fact that our county has no pick-up of recyclables and we must store and drive the items our selves. But it seems odd to me to link consumption of bottled water with the fact that dry, arid developing nations lack access to clean water. This link is strongly asserted by the National Coalition of American Nuns on its blog (scroll down to “Bottled Water” on October 22, 2006). In that article, it is suggested that, “The depletion of fresh water resources for commercial gain brings suffering to poor people throughout the world. The reliance on bottled water delays the construction of facilities to deliver purified water to many underdeveloped countries and perpetuates the corporate exploitation of the poor.”

There is no evidence to suggest that the reason some people do not have access to clean drinking water is because some folks, particularly Americans, drink water from a bottle. In fact, during the aftermath surrounding Hurricane Katrina, the only access to water that many people had came from bottled water that was shipped in droves to the Gulf Coast. Ditto on relief efforts in other places, including some developing countries. Bottled water serves as a stop gap measure until natural potable water can be introduced.

Not only does this campaign lack any clear logic or good evidence, but it seems silly. Yes, everyone needs access to water, and yes, it is essential to human survival. But how does pumping water from an American aquifer and bottling it keep developing nations from getting access to clean water? Instead of spending money on this campaign, perhaps it could be spent to organizations like the Peace Corp, who actually go to remote villages and help bring clean water to the people who need it.

+++++++++++++++++
editorial note: I know I have this habit for being a bit snarky with issues, and tend to write in a way that may be construed as condescending. I do not intend to mock these folks (well, maybe the nun), because I think they are trying to do what they see as right. Honestly, after giving the materials provided a fair read, I just think they are dead wrong.

13 Responses to “Thou Shalt Not Drink Bottled Water”

  1. Anonymous Says:

    I think this is just going a bit overboard. There are a lot of other issues that deserve attention.

    Sorry about the extra comments yesterday. Even as a commentor, I have problems with Blogger!

  2. Tom in Ontario Says:

    While I agree that it’s sometimes hard to make the connections, I don’t think the campaign is stupid, ill- conceived nor dead wrong. You may not be convinced but you might give these links a try.

    http://www.kairoscanada.org/e/ecology/water/index.asp
    http://www.kairoscanada.org/e/ecology/water/10concerns.asp

    And here’s a quote from one of the links above:

    Bottled water: It’s everywhere these days. But do we really need it?

    Just asking that question can start a hot debate. So we’re going to wade right in and say that unless there’s no safe alternative, bottled water should be avoided. We think bottled water turns a public, common good into a private one (and an expensive one at that). The cash we spend on supposedly safer bottled water is better spent on improving public systems for everyone—especially rural and Aboriginal communities that may experience boil-water orders for years on end because of under funded (or non-existent) public water systems.

    Then there’s the ecological angle. Bottled water removes water from the watershed, including underground water sources that can take centuries to replenish. And the millions of plastic bottles that result from this industry are choking recycling systems and dumps across the country. Why create them in the first place?

  3. In my home, I have access to safe drinking water from the tap. For me, it is an issue of financial stewardship. I’d rather not spend money of bottled water when I don’t need to. I’d rather give that $2 to an organization that helps communities have access to clean water, like digging wells or installing filters.

    Of course, bottled water is also a helpful convenience, like at the airport, where I can’t bring the water from my tap, or when I am out and starting to feel dehydrated.

  4. LutherPunk Says:

    Art – no worries…I just thought you really believed in your comment so much you wanted to leave 5 times!

    Tom – I never said they were stupid. I do stand by my other statements, however. What I read from numerous websites supporting this movement is much like what you posted above: lots of platitudes with no evidence linking the drinking of bottled water in the North America to the world’s water woes.

    Anna – We started buying bottled water during my wife’s pregnancy simply because she had an aversion to our tap water that made her feel sick to her stomach, like many other things did during the pregnancy. As it was, she didn’t hold down much of anything for a while, so it made sense to buy it so that there would be something there. But I am with you on helping people get the access they need.

    I guess my big objection is breaking out the word sin here.

  5. While we have what may be considered “Safe” drinking water, it takes like CRAP! And I will not drink it, I will continue to buy my water from the grocery store, of course I’ll have to add the Crystal Lite packets to drown out the taste of the water, but oh well. And another thing, is the issue here the actual bottling of water, or is it not recycling the bottles? If it’s an issue of recycling, then what about 2-liter colas bottles, 1- liters, or 20 oz bottles? If it’s the water issue, that could be considered racist. Water? Colorless. Sodas? You get the picture.

  6. Anonymous Says:

    I think it was six!

  7. If I ever drank tap water in front of my aunt she would say “don’t drink tap water, something could have died in the river!”
    I buy bottled and re use the bottles when I fill up with filtered water.
    I hope baby is doing well!

  8. P.S. (an after-thought) Says:

    What about those tap filters or pitcher filters for water in the home? I always think that bottled water and the prevalence of soft drinks are a “want” transformed into a “need” by the engines (engineers) of the profit motive. Think also of all the energy used to distribute Coca Cola et al.

    When I see TV pictures of truck loads of bottled water in various disaster sites, I think of all the petroleum needed to transport all that water, not to mention the energy used in making the bottles, filling the bottles. Not to mention some profits for somebody. And in disaster situations, of course, water needs to be brought in. I don’t think that in a disaster, much thought would be given to recycling.

    But wouldn’t there be a more energy efficient way to distribute water?

    In many other countries, easy to dig wells are just not an answer. In the US, many of the pioneers had clean springs or could dig a shallow well. These days, with dense population in many places, safe-water wells are not possible to be dug by ordinary people. Money and machines are needed. And then the wells are for a whole community, wtih people walking a distance to get the water and carrying it by hand. For example, the French government donated money for wells in Madagascar.

    I don’t see the bottling of the water, itself, as the moral issue, but rather the use of the energy resources to do the bottling and transporting as an issue. And perhaps that is a moral issue.

    [BTW I feel the same way about the obvious energy costs involved in getting such a high percentage of our consumer goods from across the ocean. We may be paying more to transport things than we pay the workers. Even furniture comes from overseas. Yes, I'm guilty here.]

  9. P.S. (an after-thought) Says:

    Dang, sorry about the double posting. Nearly every time I make a comment, it tells me that I did the secret letters wrongly, so I try again.

  10. LutherPunk Says:

    ah…the joys of blogger and the double post!

  11. Hi LP,

    I have dithered for days now about replying to this post, because a) it’s a dead thread now and b) a joke’s a joke, and I hate to be the one who is so self-serious.

    BUT I think (though the plastic waste problem is not negligible) the main issue here is the privatization of water resources globally. How does water get bottled? Coca-Cola or Perrier buys up formerly public water sources and puts it in bottles. Sure, we all pay for our water, but it used to be that we paid a municipal (not-for-profit) water utility or dug a well. For Americans (at least those in the middle classese) it’s probably mostly an inconvenience that our water comes from for-profit companies now. For people in developing countries it can mean not having access to water at all. A case in point was Bechtel’s (can I say that on public bandwidth?) takeover of the water system in Cochabamba, Bolivia, and subsequent exponential price increases. Eventually poor laborers and farmers fought back and made the water supply public again, but not without bloodshed, and others have not fared as well.

    Of course situations like Katrina call for different measures, but in the main I concur with the maligned nuns that it’s better to have public facilities for water purification than to assume the solution is going to come out of a bottle.

  12. LutherPunk Says:

    Gloria – I appreciate your comment. Saying that something is “better” is quite a bit different than saying something is a “sin”. In a perfect world, maybe bottled water wouldn’t exist. But it does…and if people don’t like it, then they are free to choose not to consume it. I am cool with that, just like it doesn’t bother me if people are vegans or if they refuse to run air conditioning or any other measure they deem to be the more moral choice.

    I think the line gets crossed when you call something a sin. I am all for consciousness raising and responsibility, but to assert that I have distanced myself from God because I have a bottle of water demonstrates a theology that seems to lack cohesion or real demonstrability.

    Again, that is just my take on it.

  13. Thanks for your thoughtful reply, LP. You always do give weight to what people say, and I respect that.

    I guess my take (which I do not take to be higher or more moral or right than your take) is that buying a bottle of water (or a case or two) is not a sin. Even working for Bechtel is not a sin. But in American theology, I think we give short shrift to the idea of corporate sin, and the myriad tiny actions we take together that deprive Bolivians, or even willow flycatchers, of water they need to live add up to sinfulness. Thanks for letting me bend your ear.

    Gloria

Leave a Reply